An Alternative to Brogan-Style Blogging
I wrote my Boogie Man post yesterday, and I have to say that I feel pretty good about it. Sure, the language was a little stronger than is politically correct, but then again you probably don’t come here for PC drivel. You can read the post here, if you like.
More than catharsis, the post yesterday enabled me to pick the brain of a relatively popular marketing blogger. Stanford Smith, whose blog inspired yesterday’s post, weighed in with a substantial comment. Among his suggestions was the following:
Why does this get under your skin? Talk about how you plan to build a business around YOUR audience in a new or different way. I’m sure Chris would love to see how his example has inspired different monetization strategies.
So that’s what I’m going to do.
The Problem with Brogan-Style Blogging
In case you missed yesterday’s post, here’s the problem as I see it with blogs whose approaches are similar to Chris Brogan’s. (And it’s worth noting that I’m not saying that this is a bad approach to blogging. I’m only pointing out differences in our marketing philosophies.)
Brogan-style blogging hooks you with good ideas. It develops a rhythm wherein you come to the blog expecting good ideas. And then those ideas somehow evolve into something proprietary and closed-source that requires a buy-in.
Nothing wrong here, except that the buy-in usually involves having someone take you step-by-step through the marketing/PR/advertising/customer service arenas, ultimately arriving at a handful of conclusions you could have reached yourself if you had just talked it out with your coworkers over lunch.
I’m all for the open exchange of information. I love going to conferences with big table discussions. I love reading online forums and blogs that encourage lively chatter. But anything that runs contrary to the free exchange of ideas — those who would charge for the venue or, worse, the ideas themselves, for example — starts off in the red, in my mind.
Why We Need an Alternative
I don’t expect to be paid for having ideas. I don’t expect to receive payment because people read or even like my ideas. To think that those ideas are mine to be paid for is absurd — my ideas are the product of the ideas of a litany of authors, whose ideas were amalgamations of other ideas, and so on. Learning these makes me better at what I do; but it’s what I do that deserves payment.
Now, if it happens that my analysis of a particular idea reaches someone who is so impressed that she wants to call me and discuss this idea further, so be it. And if I can convince her that her company has work that needs to be done, and that I’m both qualified and affordable, go me. But to this point, I have no right to expect that anything I’ve done is worth a red cent. And that is true even if — even if – something I’ve said causes someone to perform some action that makes money for a third party.
If you take Brogan’s style to the extreme — if everyone blogged like him — then we’d be stuck in a world where honest commentary and profit-driven review are so intertwined as to be indistinguishable. If, on the other hand, we removed affiliate promotion from the blogs of thought leaders, we’d know exactly what we were getting (in theory). I know which world I’d rather live in.
An Alternative to Brogan-Style Blogging
Brogan talks about the art of asking for the sale. In his case, asking for the sale often means clicking a link to buy something he didn’t create — a book on Amazon, a camera, a suitcase, a WordPress theme, what have you. What if, instead of asking us to buy things, a blogger was forced to sell only his own talents? Do you think he would spend more time vetting his ideas? Developing his theories? Implementing strategies and guaging their effects? I think he would.
Instead of blogging on the freemium model — giving away small or general ideas for free and charging an “upgrade” fee for the big or specific ideas — why not promote the free exchange of all ideas and charge only for their implementation?
You might have guessed it, but I’m a big fan of doing things. When a client hires me to consult on SEO, I don’t just present them with ideas. I actually do the optimizing. When they hire me for social media management, I don’t just walk in and train people on the finer points of being social. I actually log hours at the keyboard representing the brand. I tell clients that I’m not a consultant; I’m a marketer. I do marketing.
And that’s the alternative that I propose. I propose that bloggers stop thinking about ways to improve their revenue stream today, and start thinking about how to improve their trade forever. It’s time marketing bloggers stepped out from behind the pulpit and sat down with their fellow marketers. It’s time they started sharing ideas. It’s time they focused on doing marketing, not just talking about marketing because it’s what marketers are reading.
And I’ll start this rehab with myself. Hello, my name is Matt. I’m addicted to “New Marketing”. I’ve been clean and sober for one day.
Who are you?
Image credit: framesmedia | Dan


Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
Whoa! Holy controversial, Batman! My first thought was to rush in and defend Chris because I am a rabid fan of his, but then that is a bit impulsive and pretty sure CB can take care of himself. Plus if I continue to blather on about him so positively all over the internet, he might just have that restraining order he’s been holding onto notarized.
So? All I can do is offer my own opinion of why I gravitate toward the CB style of blogging. It is my belief that people like to give when they receive something of value. Sometimes they need a push as to exactly how they can give back. Reading Trust Agents and stalking chrisbrogan.com, crystallized my own thoughts of how and why I wanted to blog. His prose and advice saved me months (or years) of digging around in the dirt to laser focus me on my next steps for my own career.
I too was in the trenches “doing” SEO, “doing” social media, “doing” web construction, and while I enjoy it, it really isn’t my passion. I am a big thinker, I like to share, and I like to teach. So yeah, I’ll say it right here: I want to emulate Chris Brogan. No, I don’t want to BE Chris Brogan (can’t actually see myself in a camaro; more of a mini-cooper chick), but I have vast amounts of appreciation for what Chris has shared about his process so that I can learn from it.
How do I repay Chris (because I DO want to). First I can actually say thank you. Which I have. Second, I can purchase things I honestly need through his affiliate links. If he was actually in the trenches “doing” everything he advocates in Trust Agents, he would not have the time to post on his methods and thought processes. Which I need him to do.
…and he needs to get paid.
So I will say it here and now: My name is Nanci Murdock and I am a New Marketing addict. I have no need for a recovery program because New marketing IS my recovery program.
As a blogger, I adore the conversation and I do respect your thoughts and nothing but support for your own journey. Wishing you all the best in your recovery (if you have an iPhone, maybe there is an app for that!)
Nanci
Nanci,
Brilliant stuff! Thanks for sharing.
I agree that people who affect our lives (and careers) positively should be thanked profusely. If for you that means clicking links and buying books, great! I’m sure Chris really appreciates that.
But here’s where I’m coming from: I think every idea is the product of some combination of other ideas. I used to read extensively in philosophy and theology, and some of my style and content springs from the ideas of great minds in those fields. But I can’t very well send Plato a check, can I?
I’m inclined to, though. And more importantly, I recognize that whatever I post here is part of a larger and infinitely more important conversation going on in the world around me. I get tremendous value from both listening to and participating in that conversation. So where do I send THAT check?
Likewise, I agree that Chris deserves credit for having remarkable ideas. But to whom does he owe his ability to generate those ideas? Would his ideas be as valuable outside of the context of other ideas? Can he effectively credit all of his sources of inspiration? Can anyone? I’d like to credit Chris, but I’d also like to give credit to everyone who helped make those ideas great. Giving money to the speaker while not giving to the sources seems like bad karma to me.
And that’s the purpose of this blog. There are great ideas everywhere. Take a look at the Answers section of LinkedIn, and you’ll find an abundance of great ideas from relatively unknown professionals. I want those people to shape conversations. Blogging their ideas is a way for me to promote thoughtful, open conversation.
Thanks, Nanci, for contributing to that conversation!
–Matt
Matt,
Thanks so much for seeing my point of view. I think I have a better understanding now of yours as well. I just wish I had the answers. You are right, no checks (or paypal!) can be sent to Plato. I guess I just want to do what I can in term of doing my part to send gratitude (and $$) to those who shape my experience and make it better.
I do appreciate the dialogue.
Best,
Nanci
Nanci,
Lovely to talk with you. Cheers!
–Matt
As much as we disagree on a few issues, I just have to give a big shout out to, “The Chalkboard”. Thanks for making the internet awesome!
/n
Nanci,
Oh, then you’ll want to check back on Monday. Chalkie’s making his debut on the front page.